The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties for Brazilian adults after a burn injury.

OBJECTIVES: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, validate, verify the reliability and estimate the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the UEFI to Brazilian Portuguese (UEFI-Br) for burns. METHODS: The study was carried out with 131 Brazilian burn cases at two time points, at discharge and at the first outpatient follow-up (15-21 days after discharge) in a Burn Treatment Center. The adaptation process of the UEFI was based on international recommendations. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief-Br (BSHS-B-Br) was also applied in order to analyze construct validity of the UEFI-Br and distribution-based methods were used to estimate its MDC. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-rater reliability were good with ICC of 0.986 (CI 95 %: 0.98-0.99) and 0.969 (CI 95 %: 0.955-0.979), respectively, at discharge and 0.997 (CI 95 %: 0.996-0.998) and 0.987 (CI 95 %: 0.981-0.991), respectively, at the first outpatient follow-up appointment. We found good internal consistency with Cronbach's α values of 0.987 and 0.996, respectively, at the two times. The SEM was 4.42 and 2.31 at the first and second time points, respectively. The UEFI-Br scores demonstrated strong correlation with the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief-Br (BSHS-B-Br) function domain scores (r = 0.87-0.90). No significant correlation was found between UEFI-Br scores and participants' characteristics. The MDC of the UEFI-Br lies between 11 and 13 points. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the UEFI-Br, a useful tool to assess upper limb function and disability, is a valid and reliable tool for use with Brazilian burn survivors. The MDC for the instrument was determined to be 11-13 points.

Comparison of Physical Activity Patterns among Three Major Chronic Respiratory Diseases.

Although the level of physical activity in daily life (PADL) plays a vital role concerning the health of subjects with chronic lung diseases, it remains uncertain how PADL patterns compare among different conditions. This study's objective was to compare the PADL levels of subjects with COPD, asthma and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); and to investigate PADL behaviour in different diseases' severity. Stable subjects who had not undergone pulmonary rehabilitation in the previous year were included. Subjects were divided into two subgroups according to disease severity: mild/moderate and severe/very severe. The primary outcome was time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA) (Actigraph GT3x) measured during one week over 12 h/day; other assessments included pulmonary function, peripheral muscle strength and exercise capacity. Comparisons among subgroups were corrected for age, BMI and sex. The analysis involved 119 subjects (47 asthma, 48 COPD and 24 IPF). Subjects with asthma had higher PADL levels than those with COPD and IPF (MVPA 18(14-22) vs. 8(4-12) vs. 7(1-12) min/day, respectively; p ancova = 0.002). Subjects with severe/very severe IPF had the lowest PADL level among all subgroups. Adult subjects with asthma have higher PADL levels than those with COPD and IPF, whereas patients with severe and very severe IPF are the most physically inactive subjects.

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit instrument for individuals with COPD.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit (C-PPAC) instrument to the cultural setting in Brazil and to determine the criterion validity, test-retest reliability agreement, and internal consistency of this version. METHODS: A protocol for cultural adaptation and validation was provided by the authors of the original instrument and, together with another guideline, was applied in a Portuguese-language version developed by a partner research group from Portugal. The adapted Brazilian Portuguese version was then cross-sectionally administered twice within a seven-day interval to 30 individuals with COPD (57% were men; mean age was 69 ± 6 years; and mean FEV1 was 53 ± 18% of predicted) to evaluate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Participants also completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the modified Medical Research Council scale, the COPD Assessment Test, and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire to evaluate criterion validity. RESULTS: The C-PPAC instrument showed good internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability: "amount" domain = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and "difficulty" domain = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76-0.96). Bland & Altman plots, together with high Lin's concordance correlation coefficients, reinforced that agreement. Criterion validity showed moderate-to-strong correlations of the C-PPAC with all of the other instruments evaluated, especially with the IPAQ (rho = -0.63). CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the C-PPAC is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating the experience of Brazilian individuals with COPD with their physical activity in daily life.

Assessment of sedentary behaviour in individuals with COPD: how many days are necessary?

Objective: The objective of the present study was to define the minimum number of monitoring days required for the adequate cross-sectional assessment of sedentary behaviour in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the sedentary behaviour of individuals with COPD was assessed using two physical activity monitors during awake time for seven consecutive days. Time spent per day in activities requiring ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) and in sitting, lying and sitting+lying positions was calculated taking into account the average of 7 days (as a reference in all analyses) and of all 119 possible combinations of 2---6 days. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and linear regression analyses were performed for all combinations. Results: 91 individuals were analysed (47 female, 66±9 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 50±15% predicted). For the variables time spent per day in activities ≤1.5METs and sitting, the average of any combination of at least four assessment days was sufficient to adequately reflect the average of 7 days (adjusted R2≥0.929, ICC≥0.962, p<0.0001 for all). For time spent per day lying and sitting+lying, only two assessment days were enough (adjusted R2≥0.937, ICC≥0.968, p<0.0001 for all). Results were maintained independently of patient sex, disease severity, day of the week, daylight time or daytime naps. Conclusions: The average of 4 days of objective monitoring was sufficient to adequately reflect the results of a 1-week assessment of the main outcomes related to sedentary behaviour in individuals with moderate to very severe COPD, regardless of sex, disease severity, day of the week, daylight time and occurrence of daytime naps.

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit instrument for individuals with COPD / Adaptação cultural e validação da versão brasileira do instrumento PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit para indivíduos com DPOC

ABSTRACT Objective: To adapt the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit (C-PPAC) instrument to the cultural setting in Brazil and to determine the criterion validity, test-retest reliability agreement, and internal consistency of this version. Methods: A protocol for cultural adaptation and validation was provided by the authors of the original instrument and, together with another guideline, was applied in a Portuguese-language version developed by a partner research group from Portugal. The adapted Brazilian Portuguese version was then cross-sectionally administered twice within a seven-day interval to 30 individuals with COPD (57% were men; mean age was 69 ± 6 years; and mean FEV1 was 53 ± 18% of predicted) to evaluate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Participants also completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the modified Medical Research Council scale, the COPD Assessment Test, and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire to evaluate criterion validity. Results: The C-PPAC instrument showed good internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability: "amount" domain = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and "difficulty" domain = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76-0.96). Bland & Altman plots, together with high Lin's concordance correlation coefficients, reinforced that agreement. Criterion validity showed moderate-to-strong correlations of the C-PPAC with all of the other instruments evaluated, especially with the IPAQ (rho = −0.63). Conclusions: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the C-PPAC is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating the experience of Brazilian individuals with COPD with their physical activity in daily life.

RESUMO Objetivo: Adaptar o instrumento PROactive Physical Activity in COPD - clinical visit (C-PPAC) ao contexto cultural brasileiro e determinar a validade de critério, concordância da confiabilidade teste-reteste e consistência interna dessa versão. Métodos: Um protocolo de adaptação cultural e validação foi fornecido pelos autores do instrumento original e, juntamente com outra diretriz, foi aplicado em uma versão em português desenvolvida por um grupo de pesquisa parceiro de Portugal. A versão brasileira adaptada foi então aplicada transversalmente duas vezes, com intervalo de sete dias, em 30 indivíduos com DPOC (57% de homens; média de idade de 69 ± 6 anos; e média do VEF1 de 53 ± 18% do previsto) para avaliação da consistência interna e da confiabilidade teste-reteste. Os participantes também responderam ao International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), à escala modificada do Medical Research Council, ao COPD Assessment Test e ao Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire para avaliação da validade de critério. Resultados: O instrumento C-PPAC apresentou boa consistência interna e excelente confiabilidade teste-reteste: domínio "quantidade" = 0,87 (IC95%: 0,73-0,94) e domínio "dificuldade" = 0,90 (IC95%: 0,76-0,96). As disposições gráficas de Bland-Altman, juntamente com os altos coeficientes de correlação de concordância de Lin, reforçaram essa concordância. A validade de critério mostrou correlações moderadas a fortes do instrumento C-PPAC com todos os outros instrumentos avaliados, principalmente com o IPAQ (rho = −0,63). Conclusões: A versão brasileira do instrumento C-PPAC é uma ferramenta confiável e válida para avaliar a experiência de indivíduos brasileiros com DPOC em relação à sua atividade física na vida diária.

Use of different reference values for handgrip strength in individuals with COPD: analysis of agreement, discriminative capacity, and main clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE: To identify reference values for handgrip strength through a literature search and compare the agreement of reference values from Brazil with others for handgrip strength in a sample of COPD patients in Brazil, as well as to determine which set of reference values is more discriminative regarding differences in clinical characteristics between individuals with low handgrip strength and normal handgrip strength. METHODS: To identify reference values for handgrip strength, a literature search was performed; a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of baseline-only data from two unrelated studies was then performed. Individuals were evaluated for handgrip strength, peripheral muscle strength, respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, body composition, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and functional status. RESULTS: Of the 45 studies that were initially selected, 9 met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis, which included 99 COPD patients in Brazil (52% of whom were male with GOLD stage II-IV COPD). The prevalence of low handgrip strength varied across studies (from 9% to 55%), the set of reference values for handgrip strength in a sample of individuals in Brazil having classified 9% of the study sample as having low handgrip strength. The level of agreement between the reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil and the other sets of reference values varied from weak to excellent. The reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil showed the highest number of significantly different characteristics between individuals with low and normal handgrip strength. CONCLUSIONS: The level of agreement between national and international sets of reference values for handgrip strength varied from weak to excellent in COPD patients in Brazil. Reference values for handgrip strength with higher discriminative capacity are not necessarily those that identify more individuals as having low handgrip strength.

Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) Performance of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Different Gravity Classes / Desempenho no Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) de Pacientes com Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica em Diferentes Classes de Gravidade

Studies on the association between functionality and severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are conflicting. The GOLD ABCD system, as it includes variables ​​by influence such as activities of daily living (ADLs), would be discriminative to verify the magnitude of the disease influence on functionality. The aims of this study are to compare the performance in the ADLs of patients with COPD classified at different levels of severity according to the GOLD ABCD system, as well as to verify the association among these variables. Participants performed the Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) to assess ADLs, as well as: lung function, functional exercise capacity and clinical history. LAP time was compared among the GOLD-A (n = 13), GOLD-B (n = 18) and GOLD-C + D (n = 14) groups by the Kruskal-Wallis test. χ2 test and V Cramer were used for analysis. The level of statistical significance adopted was P<0.05. For this study, 45 COPD patients completed the assessments (22 men; 65±8 years; FEV1: 51±15% predicted, 6MWT: 520±25m). Overall LAP runtime was 32[275-354] seconds (96[86-106]% predicted). When grouped together, the LAP time was 330[276-348]sec, 318[272-365]sec and 318[282-386]sec in the GOLD-A, B and C+D groups, respectively (P=0.78). There was no association between performance on the LAP and classification by the GOLD ABCD (P=0.24 and VCramer=0.27). It is possible to conclude that the performance in the ADLs of patients with COPD did not differ among the different levels of the GOLD ABCD. Other factors can interfere with performance in the LAP, due to the need for further studies. IAU)

Estudos sobre associação entre funcionalidade e gravidade da doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC), apresentam resultados conflitantes. O sistema GOLD ABCD, por incluir variáveis conhecidas por influenciar as atividades de vida diária (AVDs), seria discriminativo para verificar a magnitude da influência da doença sobre a funcionalidade. Os objetivos foram comparar o desempenho nas AVDs de pacientes com DPOC classificados em diferentes níveis de gravidade de acordo com o sistema GOLD ABCD, bem como verificar a associação entre estas variáveis. Os participantes realizaram o Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) para avaliar as AVDs, assim como: função pulmonar, capacidade funcional de exercício e histórico clínico. O tempo do LAP foi comparado entre os grupos GOLD-A (n=13), GOLD-B (n=18) e GOLD-C+D (n=14) pelo teste de Kruskal-Wallis. Teste χ2 e V Cramer foram utilizados para analisar associações. O nível de significância estatística adotado foi P<0,05. Para esse estudo, 45 pacientes com DPOC completaram as avaliações (22 homens; 65±8 anos; VEF1: 51±15%predito, TC6min: 520±25m). O tempo de execução do LAP, no geral, foi de 321 [275-354]seg (96 [86-106]%predito). Quando agrupados, o tempo do LAP foi de 330 [276-348]seg, 318 [272-365]seg e 318 [282-386]seg nos grupos GOLD-A, B e C+D, respectivamente (P=0,78). Não houve associação entre o desempenho no LAP e a classificação pelo GOLD ABCD (P=0,24 e V Cramer=0,27). Portanto, concluiu-se que o desempenho nas AVDs de pacientes com DPOC não diferiu entre os diferentes níveis do GOLD ABCD. Outros fatores podem interferir no desempenho no LAP, apontando para a necessidade de novos estudos. (AU)

Use of different reference values for handgrip strength in individuals with COPD: analysis of agreement, discriminative capacity, and main clinical implications / Uso de diferentes valores de referência de força de preensão manual em indivíduos com DPOC: análise de concordância, capacidade discriminativa e principais implicações clínicas

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify reference values for handgrip strength through a literature search and compare the agreement of reference values from Brazil with others for handgrip strength in a sample of COPD patients in Brazil, as well as to determine which set of reference values is more discriminative regarding differences in clinical characteristics between individuals with low handgrip strength and normal handgrip strength. Methods: To identify reference values for handgrip strength, a literature search was performed; a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of baseline-only data from two unrelated studies was then performed. Individuals were evaluated for handgrip strength, peripheral muscle strength, respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, body composition, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and functional status. Results: Of the 45 studies that were initially selected, 9 met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis, which included 99 COPD patients in Brazil (52% of whom were male with GOLD stage II-IV COPD). The prevalence of low handgrip strength varied across studies (from 9% to 55%), the set of reference values for handgrip strength in a sample of individuals in Brazil having classified 9% of the study sample as having low handgrip strength. The level of agreement between the reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil and the other sets of reference values varied from weak to excellent. The reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil showed the highest number of significantly different characteristics between individuals with low and normal handgrip strength. Conclusions: The level of agreement between national and international sets of reference values for handgrip strength varied from weak to excellent in COPD patients in Brazil. Reference values for handgrip strength with higher discriminative capacity are not necessarily those that identify more individuals as having low handgrip strength.

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar valores de referência de força de preensão manual por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica e comparar, em pacientes com DPOC no Brasil, o nível de concordância entre valores de referência de força de preensão manual obtidos no Brasil com outros valores de referência, bem como determinar qual conjunto de valores de referência é mais discriminativo em relação a características clínicas em indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa e normal. Métodos: Para identificar valores de referência de força de preensão manual, foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica. Em seguida, foi realizada uma análise transversal retrospectiva de dados exclusivamente basais provenientes de dois estudos não relacionados. Os indivíduos foram avaliados quanto à força de preensão manual, força muscular periférica, força muscular respiratória, função pulmonar, composição corporal, capacidade de exercício, dispneia e estado funcional. Resultados: Dos 45 estudos inicialmente selecionados, 9 preencheram os critérios de inclusão na análise, que incluiu 99 pacientes com DPOC no Brasil (52% dos quais eram homens com DPOC no estágio II-IV da GOLD). A prevalência de força de preensão manual baixa variou entre os estudos (de 9% a 55%), sendo que os valores de referência de força de preensão manual em indivíduos no Brasil classificaram 9% dos pacientes com DPOC como sendo indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa. O nível de concordância entre os valores de referência para indivíduos no Brasil e os demais valores de referência variou de fraco a excelente. Os valores de referência para indivíduos no Brasil revelaram o maior número de características significativamente diferentes em indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa e normal. Conclusões: O nível de concordância entre valores de referência nacionais e internacionais de força de preensão manual variou de fraco a excelente em pacientes com DPOC no Brasil. Os valores de referência de força de preensão manual com maior capacidade discriminativa não são necessariamente aqueles que identificam mais indivíduos como sendo indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa.

Handgrip Strength as a Reflection of General Muscle Strength in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Muscle dysfunction is one of the main features in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Handgrip strength (HS) has been used as a representation of general muscle strength in various populations, and a few studies found correlation between HS and other measures of upper and lower limbs' muscle strength in the general population, although this was not yet studied in depth in COPD. The aims of this study were to verify if HS is cross-sectionally well correlated with upper and lower limbs' muscle strength in individuals with COPD, and to identify a new cutoff for handgrip weakness in this population. HS was assessed by a dynamometer, whereas other muscle strength assessments comprised maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the quadriceps femoris and 1-repetition maximum (1RM) of biceps and triceps brachii, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and quadriceps femoris. Additional assessments included pulmonary function and volumes, body composition and exercise capacity. Fifty individuals with COPD were studied (65 ± 7 years; FEV1 51 ± 14%pred). HS showed moderate-to-strong correlations with all 1-RM assessments (0.62

Instruments to assess function or functionality in adults after a burn injury: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of functionality or function, through valid and reliable instruments, is essential during rehabilitation of adults after a burn injury. Currently, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the most appropriate tool that should be used to assess function or functionality; there is also no synthesis of the current studies published in this area. OBJECTIVES: To investigate and report the instruments used to assess function or functionality in adults after a burn injury; to identify the characteristics and evidence on their measurement properties; and to evaluate their clinical utility. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature via six electronic databases and via screening reference lists of relevant studies. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016048065) and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Studies in which function or functionality of upper and/or lower limbs of adults after a burn injury was assessed were included. Exclusion criteria comprised studies in pediatric populations and conference abstracts. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included. Twelve questionnaires and seven objective tests for function or functionality were identified. Three specific tools were found; four generic instruments have been validated in burns. Nine studies evaluated the instruments' measurement properties, presenting at least one property classified as 'fair' quality. Finally, 18 instruments demonstrated clinical utility. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated that most instruments used to assess function or functionality in adults with a burn injury have not been specifically developed for this population and had their measurement properties poorly studied. Conversely, almost all instruments had clinical utility.

The Gini Coefficient: A New Approach to Assess Physical Activity Inequality in COPD.

Increasing physical activity (PA) is a complex and challenging task in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, some questions are raised regarding the evaluation of PA in these patients: Have all aspects of PA evaluation in patients with COPD already been explored in the scientific literature and clinical practice? What is the clinical importance of assessing PA inequality? PA inequality is defined as the Gini coefficient (Ginicoef) of the PA distribution of a population and is already shown to have implications for public health in the general population. It is a simple tool that might allow a better understanding of PA disparities among different COPD populations, although to our knowledge there is no previous investigation of PA inequality in patients with COPD using the Ginicoef. In this perspective study we have provided examples of the Ginicoef use in different scenarios. Future studies might try to apply it in order to identify subpopulations with higher PA inequality, and perhaps are therefore more prone to benefit most from interventions specifically tailored to promote PA. In summary, we propose the quantification of PA inequality with the Ginicoef as a tool that might allow us to see PA even more comprehensively than we already do, expanding our perspective on PA in patients with COPD.

Six-minute walk test in burned subjects: Applicability, reproducibility and performance at hospital discharge.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its clinical relevance in several populations, there is no evidence on applicability of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in burned subjects. OBJECTIVES: To verify the applicability and reproducibility of the 6MWT in burned individuals and to analyze patients' performance in this test at hospital discharge. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, burned individuals performed two 6MWT at hospital discharge, according to international standardization. In addition to walked distance, physiological and symptomatic variables were collected. Clinical history and demographic data were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred individuals were evaluated (70 men, 10 [6-18]% total body surface area burned). There was excellent agreement between the two 6MWT (ICC = 0.97). However, 73% of subjects increased the walked distance in the second test (23 [-9-47]m or 5 [-2-10]%; P = 0.001). Considering the best 6MWT, the walked distance was 488 [396-718]m (80 [65-92]%pred), and 51% of the individuals had limited functional exercise capacity. Additionally, participants without lower limb involvement presented better 6MWT than others (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The 6MWT was applicable, well tolerated and reproducible at hospital discharge in burned individuals. However, there was considerable learning effect between the first and second test. Finally, the reduced exercise capacity observed reinforces need for early rehabilitation in this population.

Which is the best protocol and cut-off point in the 4-metre gait speed test to discriminate exercise capacity in COPD? / Qual o melhor protocolo e ponto de corte no teste 4-metre gait speed para discriminar capacidade de exercício na Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica?

Objective To determine the discriminative capacity and cut-off point of different 4-metre gait speed test (4MGS) protocols in identifying preserved or reduced exercise capacity using the six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); also, to compare 4MGS protocols and characteristics of individuals according to the best cut-off point. Methods We evaluated fifty-six patients with COPD, all of which were submitted to the assessment of anthropometric characteristics, pulmonary function (spirometry) and functional exercise capacity (6MWT and four protocols of the 4MGS). In the 4MGS test, patients were instructed to walk at normal pace and at maximum speed in a 4 meters course (4MGS 4m - usual pace and at maximum) and 8 meters course (4MGS 8m - usual pace and at maximum). Results Only the 4MGS 4m-maximum protocol was able to identify preserved exercise capacity in the 6MWT (AUC=0.70) with moderate correlation between them (r=0.52; P=0<0.0001). The cut-off point found in the 4MGS 4m-maximum was 1.27 m/s. Patients with preserved exercise capacity (4MGS 4m-maximum ≥1.27m/s) walker greater distances on the 6MWT in %pred (91±2 vs 76±3; P<0.0001). In the other comparisons involving gender, BMI, FEV1% pred and GOLD index there were no significant differences between the groups. In addition, the agreement of individuals classified as preserved and reduced exercise capacity in the 6MWT and 4MGS 4m-maximum was significant (P = 0.008). Conclusion The 4MGS 4m-maximum test can be used to discriminate preserved exercise capacity in patients with COPD and correlates with the 6MWT.

Correlação entre a diferença da capacidade vital lenta e forçada com a atividade física na vida diária em pacientes com Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Correlación entre la diferencia en la capacidad vital lenta y forzada con la actividad física en la vida diaria de pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Relationship between the difference of slow and forced vital capacity and physical activity in daily life in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

RESUMO O objetivo do estudo foi correlacionar a diferença entre capacidade vital lenta (CVL) e capacidade vital forçada (CVF) (CVL-CVF) com a atividade física na vida diária (AFVD) em pacientes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC); e verificar as diferenças na AFVD entre indivíduos com CVL maior ou menor do que a CVF. Vinte e oito indivíduos com DPOC (18 homens; 67±8 anos; VEF1: 40±13% previsto) tiveram a função pulmonar avaliada pela espirometria e foram divididos em dois grupos: CVL>CVF (n=17) e CVL≤CVF (n=11). Ademais, tiveram a AFVD avaliada objetivamente pelo monitor de atividade física DynaPort®, que quantifica na vida diária, dentre outros, o tempo gasto por dia andando, em pé, sentado e deitado. Não foram encontradas correlações significativas entre CVL-CVF e as variáveis da AFVD no grupo geral. No grupo CVL>CVF foi encontrada significância estatística na correlação entre a CVL-CVF e o tempo gasto por dia em pé (r=−0,56) e sentado (r=0,75). Já no grupo CVL≤CVF, houve correlação significativa somente com o tempo gasto por dia em pé (r=0,57) e deitado (r=−0,62). Ao comparar ambos os grupos, não houve diferença estatisticamente significante para nenhuma das variáveis da AFVD (p>0,05 para todas). No grupo com CVL maior que a CVF houve correlação alta com o tempo gasto sentado, mas não com o tempo andando. Portanto, indivíduos com maior obstrução ao fluxo aéreo segundo a diferença CVL-CVF tendem a gastar mais tempo em atividades de menor gasto energético, que não envolvam caminhar.

RESUMEN El presente estudio tuvo el objetivo de correlacionar la diferencia entre la capacidad vital lenta (CVL) y la capacidad vital forzada (CVF) (CVL-CVF) con la actividad física en la vida diaria (AFVD) de pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC); y verificar las diferencias de la AFVD entre individuos con CVL mayor o menor que la CVF. Se evaluaron la función pulmonar de veintiocho personas con EPOC (18 hombres; 67±8 años; VEF1: 40±13% esperado) mediante espirometría, y los dividieron en dos grupos: CVL>CVF (n=17) y CVL≤CVF (n=11). La AFVD también se evaluó objetivamente por el monitor de actividad física DynaPort®, el cual cuantifica el tiempo que se gasta en la vida diaria caminando, de pie, sentado y acostado. No se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre CVL-CVF y las variables de la AFVD en el grupo general. En el grupo CVL>CVF, se encontró una significación estadística en la correlación entre CVL-CVF y el tiempo que se gasta diariamente en pie (r=−0,56) y sentado (r=0,75). El grupo CVL≤CVF presentó una correlación significativa solo con el tiempo que se gasta diariamente en pie (r=0,57) y acostado (r=−0,62). La comparación entre ambos grupos no resultó en diferencias estadísticamente significativas en ninguna de las variables de AFVD (p>0,05 para todas). En el grupo con CVL mayor que la CVF, hubo una alta correlación con el tiempo que se gasta sentado, pero con el tiempo que se gasta caminando no se encontró este resultado. Se concluye que las personas con una mayor obstrucción del flujo de aire de acuerdo con la diferencia CVL-CVF tienden a gastar más tiempo en actividades con menos gasto de energía, las que no implican caminar.

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to correlate the difference of vital capacity (VC) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (VC-FVC) with physical activity in daily life (PADL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); and investigate the differences in PADL in individuals with VC smaller or greater than FVC. Twenty-eight patients with COPD (18 men, 67±8 years; FEV1: 40±13% predicted) had their lung function assessed by spirometry and were divided into two groups: VC>FVC (n=17) and VC≤CVF (n=11). Furthermore, they had their PADL evaluated by a validated activity monitor which measures, among other variables, time spent/day walking, standing, sitting and lying. There were no correlations between VC-FVC and the variables of PADL in the general group. In the group VC>FVC there was statistically significant correlation between VC-FVC and the time spent/day standing (r=−0.56) and sitting (r=0.75). In the group VC≤CVF , VC-FVC was significantly correlated with time spent/day standing (r=0.57) and lying (r=−0.62). When comparing the groups, there was no statistically significant difference for any variable of PADL (p>0.05 for all). In conclusion, in patients with VC greater than FVC there was high correlation with time spent/day sitting, but not with time spent/day walking. Therefore, individuals with greater airflow obstruction according to the VC-FVC difference tend to spend more time in activities of lower energy expenditure, which do not involve walking.

Tossing and turning: association of sleep quantity-quality with physical activity in COPD.

The association between characteristics of sleep and physical activity in daily life (PADL) has not yet been investigated in depth in subjects with COPD. This study evaluated whether time spent per day in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour are associated with sleep quantity and quality in this population. Sleep and PADL were objectively assessed by an activity monitor for 7 days and analysed on a minute-by-minute basis. Subjects also underwent spirometry and 6-min walking test (6MWT). Fifty-five subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD (28 male, 67±8 years) were studied. Subjects with total time in bed (TIB) per night ≥9 h had higher wake-after-sleep onset than TIB 7-9 h and TIB ≤7 h (195 (147-218) versus 117 (75-167) and 106 (84-156) min) and more fragmented sleep than TIB ≤7 h (8.2 (6.7-14.3) versus 6.3 (5.6-6.9) sleeping bouts; p<0.05 for all). Subjects with TIB ≥9 h also spent more time per day in sedentary behaviour and less time per day in PA of light and moderate-to-vigorous intensity than those with TIB 7-9 h and ≤7 h. In multiple linear regression, TIB ≥9 h was the only significant predictor of physical inactivity (ß=-3.3 (-5.1, -1.6), p≤0.0001), accounting for 20% of its variation. Sleep fragmentation was frequent and more pronounced in physically inactive than active patients (7.5 (6.3-9.6) versus 6.4 (5.5-7.3) sleeping bouts; p=0.027). In summary, subjects with COPD with TIB ≥9 h·night-1 have more fragmented sleep, are more sedentary and less physically active than those with <9 h·night-1, independently of the awake time. Sleep quality is frequently poor and even worse in patients classified as physically inactive.

Are the Effects of High-Intensity Exercise Training Different in Patients with COPD Versus COPD+Asthma Overlap?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presenting asthma overlap (ACO) benefit similarly in comparison to patients with only COPD after a 12-week high-intensity exercise training (ET) program. METHODS: Subjects with a diagnosis of COPD alone or ACO were evaluated and compared before and after a high-intensity ET program composed of walking and cycling plus strengthening exercises of the upper and lower limbs (3 days/week, 3 months, 36 sessions). Assessments included spirometry, bioelectrical impedance, 6-min walk test (6MWT), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL), Hospital anxiety and depression Scale, modified Medical Research Council Scale (mMRC), Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength [manovacuometry and 1-repetition maximum test (quadriceps femoris, biceps and triceps brachialis), respectively]. ACO was defined according to Sin et al. (Eur Respir J 48(3):664-673, 2016). RESULTS: The sample was composed of 74 subjects (57% male, age 67 ± 8 years, BMI 26 (21-32) kg/m2, FEV1 47 ± 17%predicted), and 12 (16%) of them were classified as presenting ACO. Both groups improved pulmonary function, 6MWT, peripheral and inspiratory muscle strength, LCADL, and SGRQ after ET (p < 0.005 for all). There were no significant interactions between ACO and COPD on ET effects (p > 0.05 for all). Likewise, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving the minimum clinical important difference for 6MWT and mMRC. CONCLUSION: High-intensity exercise training generates similar benefits in patients with COPD regardless of whether presenting asthma overlap or not.

Mortality in COPD: Comparison of Different Predictors in Patients Seeking a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program / Mortalidade na DPOC: Comparação de Diferentes Preditores nos Pacientes que Procuram um Programa de Reabilitação Pulmonar

It is clinically relevant to identify isolated factors or multidimensional predictors of mortality in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). To compare different factors in the identification of patients classified as high risk of death and to identify the prognostic value of isolated factors against the BODE index. Patients were evaluated considering the factors associated with mortality: pulmonary function with forced expiratory volume (FEV1); body mass index (BMI); body mass index (LMWI); Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) with estimation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max); six-minute walk test (6MWT); Medical Research Council scale; BODE index and sedentary time. Cut-off points previously associated with risk of death were used to calculate the proportion of patients at high risk of death. ROC curve analysis was used to test the prognostic value of each variable against the BODE index. A total of 162 patients (86 men, age 67 ± 8 years) were included. The proportions of patients classified as high risk ranged from 12.6 to 76.5% according to all eight factors analyzed (P <0.05 vs all). The area under the curve (AUC) of each factor analyzed against the BODE index indicated insufficient discriminative capacity (0.26 < AUC < 0.44). Conclusion: There is an expressive variability of patients classified as "high risk" according to each predictor factor. Moreover, the prognostic evaluation of the patient using the BODE index cannot be replaced by the assessment of a single predictive factor. (AU)

É clinicamente relevante identificar fatores preditores de mortalidade isolados ou multidimensionais em pacientes com Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica (DPOC). O objetivo desse esuto foi comparar diferentes fatores na identificação de pacientes classificados em alto risco de morte e identificar o valor prognóstico de fatores isolados frente ao índice BODE. Foram avaliados pacientes quanto a fatores associado a mortalidade: função pulmonar com a medida do volume expiratório forçado (VEF1); índice de massa corpórea (IMC); índice de massa magra corporal (IMMC); Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) com a estimativa do consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO2máx); teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6min); escala Medical Research Council; índice BODE e tempo sedentário. Pontos de corte previamente associados com mortalidade foram utilizados para calcular a proporção de pacientes em alto risco. Análise de curva ROC foi utilizada para testar o valor prognóstico das variáveis isoladas frente ao BODE. Foram incluídos 162 pacientes (86 homens, idade 67±8 anos). As proporções de pacientes classificados em alto risco variaram de 12,6% até 76,5% de acordo com os oito fatores analisados (P<0,05 vs todos). A área sob a curva (AUC) desses fatores testados isoladamente frente ao índice BODE indicou insatisfatória capacidade discriminativa (0,26 < AUC < 0,44). Existe uma variabilidade expressiva na proporção dos pacientes classificados como "alto risco" de acordo com cada fator preditor de mortalidade. Além disso, a avaliação prognóstica do paciente obtida com o índice BODE não pode ser substituída pela avaliação de um único fator preditor. (AU)

Functional Status of Patients with COPD Assessed by London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale: Gender Association and Validity of a Cutoff Point.

PURPOSE: Whether the difference in the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the functional status of men and women stems from clinical distinctions or to the measuring instrument used is unclear. Like most instruments for assessing functional limitation in COPD, the interpretation of the results of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale is limited because a lack of a valid cutoff point to this scale. For that, this study sought to compare the functional status between men and women with COPD; and propose a cutoff point for LCADL capable of discriminating the prognosis of these individuals. METHODS: A sample of 138 subjects with moderate-severe COPD was evaluated by the LCADL. The percentage of the individual maximum score was used to obtain a cutoff point capable of discriminating patients with the worse prognosis according to the BODE Index. The cutoff point was also tested in an independent sample (n = 70). RESULTS: Regarding the total score, domestic and leisure domains of the LCADL, men had better scores than women (P ≤ 0.01). The cutoff point found was 37% (area under the curve = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.80, sensitivity = 0.55 and specificity = 0.74). Individuals who scored ≥ 37% had a worse prognosis and level of physical activities of daily living than those who scored below (P ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSION: When evaluated by the LCADL, men and women with COPD present difference in the functional status. The established cutoff point (37%) adequately discriminates individuals regarding the prognosis, contributing to improve the interpretation capacity of the LCADL.

Cluster analysis identifying patients with COPD at high risk of 2-year all-cause mortality.

The objective of the article is to identify clusters of patients with COPD according to factors known to be associated with mortality and to verify whether clusters' assignment is associated with 2-year mortality. Patients ( n = 141) were evaluated by bioelectrical impedance, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), one-repetition maximum test of the quadriceps femoris (1RMQF) and BODE index (body mass index; airflow obstruction (spirometry); dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council scale); and exercise capacity (6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance). Vital status was retrospectively checked 2 years after the assessments, and time to death was quantified for those deceased in this period. K-means analysis identified two clusters. Patients in cluster one (CL I, n = 69) presented an impaired clinical status in comparison to cluster two (CL II, n = 72). Receiver operating characteristics curves identified the cutoffs discriminating patients composing CL I: forced expiratory volume in the first second <44%pred; 6MWT <479 m; 1RMQF <19 kg; and maximum inspiratory pressures <73 cmH2O (area under the curve range 0.750-0.857). During the follow-up, 19 (13%) patients deceased, 15 in CL I (22%) and 4 in CL II (0.06%) ( p = 0.005). CL I was associated with a higher risk of 2-year mortality (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 4.3 (1.40-12.9), p = 0.01). A cluster of patients with COPD highly associated with 2-year mortality was statistically identified, and cutoffs to identify these subjects were provided.